Read more of this story at Slashdot.
所有我感兴趣的资料,webdesign,webdev,linux,etc.Enjoy。
dailyread (20 未读)
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
iPhone or iPod touch only: The already-good Pandora music recommendation engine app for the iPhone has gotten better with version 2.0, which adds Cover Flow view, artist and song info, and bookmark previews.
Take a look at some screenshots.
You'll need to sign into your free Pandora account to get started and see your stations. Make a new recommendation-driven station based on an artist; check out the suggest-as-you-tap search drop-down.
Once a song starts playing, you can give it the thumbs up or thumbs down (which informs Pandora's future recommendations), or tap the up arrow to get more options, like...
The ability to bookmark the song or artist, buy the track from iTunes, or share your station via email.
Turn your device to get into Cover Flow view, which works just like native iTunes (though I noticed a little flickering in the background album covers in my test).
Tap on the top right button to get artist details (shown here) and song details (shown below).
When you're wondering why Pandora included a recommendation in your station, the song info will tell you.
The Pandora 2.0 app is a free download for the iPhone or iPod touch only. Pandora (iTunes link) [via Webware]
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
The Windows 7 beta offers a speedier startup than its predecessor: for me the beta boots to a fully functional desktop in under 30 seconds, faster than the preview or Vista.
On the same exact computer, where I'm triple-booting Vista, XP, and now the Windows 7 beta (build 7000), I ran a set of startup tests to pit the beta against the rest, using my previous measurements. Here's what I found.
table.comparison { border-width: 1px 1px 1px 1px; border-spacing: 2px; border-style: solid solid solid solid; border-color: gray gray gray gray; border-collapse: separate; background-color: white; } table.comparison th { text-align:center; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 1px; padding: 1px 1px 1px 1px; border-style: inset inset inset inset; border-color: gray gray gray gray; background-color: #cccccc; -moz-border-radius: 0px 0px 0px 0px; } table.comparison td { text-align:center; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 1px; padding: 1px 1px 1px 1px; border-style: inset inset inset inset; border-color: gray gray gray gray; background-color: white; -moz-border-radius: 0px 0px 0px 0px; } table.comparison td.has { background-color:#8EBB8E; } table.comparison td.label { font-weight:bold;text-align:center; }The hardware: My test system has an Intel Core 2 Duo processor running at 3.16GHz with 4GB of RAM. Windows XP, Vista, and the Windows 7 beta build 7000 are all installed on the same, physical SATA hard drive (partitioned, of course).
The test: Since I'm triple-booting the three operating systems, I used a simple handheld timer to get my numbers, starting at the "Choose your operating system" screen (which comes after the BIOS startup) and ending at a fully functional desktop in my first set of tests, then the user login screen in my second. I timed each OS startup three times and averaged the results to account for my fat fingers.
Test Set 1: From Boot Choice to Fully-loaded User DesktopFor this test set, I created a non-Administrator user account with nothing in startup, and set Windows to automatically log into it on boot. These numbers start at the OS boot choice screen, and end at a fully-functional, user desktop. This isn't a true test of how long a desktop would render in real-world usage, because most people DO have programs in their startup. But these tests are to compare Windows version performance, not third-party software. That all said, the numbers:
| Operating System | Average time to reach desktop |
|---|---|
| Windows 7 Ultimate (Beta, Build 7000, 32-bit) | 28 seconds |
| Windows 7 Ultimate (Preview, Build 6801, PDC edition, 32-bit) | 32 seconds |
| Windows Vista Ultimate (32-bit, SP1) | 33 seconds |
| Windows XP Professional (SP3) | 40 seconds |
Here you can see that for the first time, Windows is offering a sub-30 second start time on pretty standard modern hardware, for the first time in at least a long time (if ever, I don't have a copy of Windows 95 or 3.1 to test). Of course, Microsoft claims that Vista boots in under 30 seconds already, but that's not the case on my tower; and only 23% of you say that your system boots in under 30 seconds. It should go without saying that this has a whole lot to do with exactly how beefy your hardware is.
Test Set 2: From Boot Choice to User Login ScreenThis test measures the amount of time from the boot OS choice screen to the user login prompt only, hence the shorter times.
| Operating System | Average time to reach login prompt |
|---|---|
| Windows 7 Ultimate (Beta, build 7000, 32-bit) | 20 seconds |
| Windows 7 Ultimate (Preview, Build 6801, PDC edition, 32-bit) | 23 seconds |
| Windows Vista Ultimate (32-bit, SP1) | 24 seconds |
| Windows XP Professional (SP3) | 29 seconds |
As you can see, the Windows 7 beta took 4 seconds off the time it takes to render a usable desktop as compared to the Win7 Preview, which adds up to a 12-second difference from Windows XP. The beta shaved 3 seconds off the boot time to login prompt as compared to the preview build.
I can hear the comments already—"are we really talking about THREE SECONDS?" Yes, neither of these are earth-shattering improvements, but they are clear and consistent speed boosts, and hopefully they're a sign that things will get even faster since Windows 7 is still in beta.
Anyone out there move over to the Windows 7 beta full-time? What are your impressions? Post 'em up in the comments.